Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Walsh's avatar

I had a chance to reread your Seen & Unseen piece on Mr. Darcy:Pagan Hero?. It was occasioned by reading "30 Great Myths About Jane Austen", Claudia L. Johnson and Clara Tuite. There the authors take the negative to their "myth" #18: "Jane Austen was a Christian moralist". The authors did affirm Jane was a devout Christian, and cited CS Lewis and Irene Collins. But anchored their argument around their understanding of "moralist". Their argument wasn't convincing to me because they seem to expect Austen, as Christian literary artist, to act as an explicit moral arbiter within the work. I find this to be a very narrow understanding of the literary craft. Austen's nuance and understanding of human nature, as well as her realism, was used by the authors to make their case that somehow Austen couldn't inhabit the "world as it is", without an implicit secularized moral worldview. I thought it was a bit silly, especially their use of Lydia Bennett, seemingly accepted back into the Bennett fold, with only Elizabeth's bemusement that Lydia could continue on as before.

I think the virtue ethics case you've made is far more convincing and dynamic then the cramped "moralist" strawman presented by these authors!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts